NEW ARGENTINE PRESIDENT JAVIER MILEI FULFILLS 50-YEAR 1973-2023 "THE GREY MAN" PROPHECY BY 'ARGENTINE NOSTRADAMUS PARRAVICINI; MILEI TELLS WEF AT DAVOS - "YOU ARE THE PROBLEM!"
1973-2024 PROPHECY FULFILLED PHOTOS: [LEFT] Argentina Prophet Benjamin Parravicini’s prophetic 1973 Psychic Drawing of Argentinian Pope Francis 2024 meeting with 2024 Argentian President JAVIER MILEI in Rome. Parravicini, known as “the Nostradamus of Argentina” predicted that JAVIER MILEI, whom Parravicini called “the Grey Man” would be elected President in Argentina in a Runoff 50 years in advance. MILEI became President on 10 December 2023, and [RIGHT] met Pope Francis on February 12, 2024.
Pope Francis meets with Argentine President Milei [1:00]
WATCH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lMJ_p3DduY
Does Solari Parravicini's prediction about the coming to power of a “phantom” refer to Milei?
The Argentine Nostradamus predicted the atomic bomb to Hiroshima, the attack on the twin towers, the inauguration of Pope Francis and the Covid-19 pandemic, among other events. Since the unexpected victory of the libertarian in the PASO, interpretations that involve him were once again disseminated on networks.
Benjamín Solari Parravicini was an Argentine painter and sculptor, well known for the prophetic drawings he made throughout his life. Some of the events he predicted were the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, the attack on the twin towers, in vitro fertilization, the inauguration of Pope Francis and the Covid-19 pandemic, among others. Given the unexpected victory in the PASO of Javier Milei , a prediction by the Argentine Nostradamus that social media users associated with the libertarian leader was recalled .
To understand the phenomenon, it is important to first understand what a psychographic is. It is “a writing or drawing made by the subject without intervention of the conscious mind, received through an extra-physical channel,” according to parapsychology dictionaries.
After the result of the Primaries, premonitory drawings by Solari Parravicini that had been spread online in May of this year returned to circulation.
Solari Parravicini, the "Argentine Nostradamus".
“A puppet of new doctrine”
A very disturbing one from 1937 says: "Argentina torn apart, divided into two ideas, will raise a puppet of new doctrine. The Church will do so in silence. Prayer will win."
“Argentina divided into two ideas” is interpreted by many users as the confrontation that Peronism and anti-Peronism have been carrying on for years, embodied mainly by Macriism and its substitutes. Thus, a society partly tired of that antagonism “ will raise a puppet . ” There the link with Milei is practically automatic.
It is worth remembering that the leader of Libertad Avanza went from being a marginal character in 2018 to becoming a celebrity who paraded on all TV channels and social networks, and in this way launched his political career. And he did so, willing to do anything ridiculous as long as people talk about him: he dressed as a “superhero”, promoted his “fest talks”, performed theatre, argued loudly with members of the entertainment industry and transformed his 2021 campaign events. and 2023 in true “shows” , which included the shouting intonation of the chorus “ Hello everyone, I am the lion” (a nickname he gave himself) of the song "Panic show" , one of the great classics of La Renga .
On the other hand, the “ new doctrine” would refer to “libertarianism” , of which Milei became its main reference in Argentina and Latin America.
Clown marketing and its political gain
The idea that the “ puppet ” that Solari Parravicini predicted would be Milei was reinforced with the interpretation of another psychographic of the plastic artist from 1937. It is one that has the following text: “Man will be a clown and will be owner and lord.” of the clown world. Long hair, narrow forehead and Papanatism.”
But the most surprising thing is the drawing. There you see a long-haired man sitting on the end of a chair. The user @Bracesco2023 contrasted that image with another of Milei taken from a television program and the resemblance is astonishing.
For those who support this theory, there are no doubts. They argue that it is enough to observe how Milei's meteoric political rise was: with more antics, a higher level of knowledge and installation of his figure, especially among centennials and a few millenials.
There are multiple examples. Some remember an event for otakus and Japanese anime fans in 2019, where the eccentric economist attended dressed as a superhero and had no qualms about smiling for the cameras.
With his black and yellow comic book hero costume, Milei introduced himself as General Anarcho-Capitalist AnCap and assured: "I come from Liberland, a land created by the principle of original appropriation of man. A land of 7 square kilometers between Croatia and Serbia, a country where taxes are not paid, a country where individual freedoms are defended, where the individual is believed and there is no place for collectivist sons of bitches who want to ruin our lives . " The exact dose of paper, ideology and fun that he put into practice to capture will.
With expressions that clearly sought to generate impact, he went further: "My mission is to kick the ass of Keynesians and collectivist sons of bitches who want to ruin our lives." The vocabulary used was no longer surprising. Every time he committed one of those outbursts, his idolatry grew. And he knew it. The more clown he becomes, the more fans he reaps.
While more adult audiences did not take him very seriously at first (some saw him as just another geek), he was clear about where to aim. And after his appearances as a cosplayer (N. de R: person who dresses as a comic, anime, manga, film or video game character and acts giving life to the character he represents), he redoubled the bet.
Immediately afterwards, he began to promote his talks and meetings under the motto #MileiFest , as if it were a fashionable music festival.
In theater, the formula also worked for him. He brought his wild verbiage to a play called “ El Consultorio de Milei” , which was a success in the 2019 summer season. Under the direction of Nito Artaza, the ultraliberal economist shared the stage with the journalist Diego Sucalesca, his sister Karina Milei and the comedian Claudio Rico and filled out the shows they did in Villa Gesell, San Bernardo and Mar del Plata.
The show had debuted in December 2018 at the Picadilly theater in Buenos Aires and the move to the Coast was a success. To the point that they later took her to Rosario, Mendoza, Tucumán, Córdoba and Corrientes. And he also performed that year outside the country: Uruguay, Miami, New York, Madrid and Barcelona are some of the places he visited.
Always ready to be ridiculous, Milei embraces his formula of hyper-dogmatic economic concepts, verbosity and bizarre style to be in the limelight.
For Parravicini, the experience with the “fantoche” ends very badly
Following the premonitions of Solari Parravicini, it can be seen that the experience with the “phantoche” would end in a terrifying disaster for the country. “Argentina will have its French Revolution, in triumph . You can see blood in the streets if you do not see the moment of the gray man ”, He wrote about the final period of “Papanatism”. From these revelations it is clear that the “phantoche” is prior to the appearance of the “gray man” who, according to the following prophecies, will be the leader who will finally bring peace and prosperity to the country.
Until his arrival and during the irruption of the “phantoche”, there would be “ fire, hunger, pestilence, death ”.
"Dragon comes the darkness seemed asleep. The terror of the bear who feigned love and brotherhood comes. The humble democrat comes, who never was, and poverty comes with him. "He, without shelter, and with them, all the explosions of disintegration ," concluded the Argentine Nostradamus in his text.
What world-renowned events did Parravicini predict?
According to his followers, the artist anticipated several events. Among them are:
- The arrival of television.
- The space race.
- In vitro fertilization.
- The rise of Fidel Castro.
- The assassination of John F. Kennedy.
- The Malvinas War.
- The atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
- The end of World War II.
- The election of Pope Francis.
- The attacks on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001.
Presidency of Javier Milei
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Javier_Milei
Special address by Javier Milei, President of Argentina | Davos 2024 | World Economic Forum
WATCH NOW! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pfcd0gWNIog
Davos 2024: Special address by Javier Milei, President of Argentina
Jan 18, 2024 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/special-address-by-javier-milei-president-of-argentina/
The president of Argentina, Javier Milei, speaking at the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
This is a transcript from the Special address by Javier Milei, President of Argentina, which took place during the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting in Davos.
Good afternoon. Thank you very much.
Today I'm here to tell you that the Western world is in danger. And it is in danger because those who are supposed to have to defend the values of the West are co-opted by a vision of the world that inexorably leads to socialism and thereby to poverty.
Unfortunately, in recent decades, the main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism. Some have been motivated by well-meaning individuals who are willing to help others, and others have been motivated by the wish to belong to a privileged caste.
We're here to tell you that collectivist experiments are never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens of the world. Rather, they are the root cause. Do believe me: no one is in better place than us, Argentines, to testify to these two points.
Thirty five years after we adopted the model of freedom, back in 1860, we became a leading world power. And when we embraced collectivism over the course of the last 100 years, we saw how our citizens started to become systematically impoverished, and we dropped to spot number 140 globally.
But before having the discussion, it would first be important for us to take a look at the data that demonstrate why free enterprise capitalism is not just the only possible system to end world poverty, but also that it's the only morally desirable system to achieve this.
If we look at the history of economic progress, we can see how between the year zero and the year 1800 approximately, world per capita GDP practically remained constant throughout the whole reference period.
If you look at a graph of the evolution of economic growth throughout the history of humanity, you would see a hockey stick graph, an exponential function that remained constant for 90% of the time and which was exponentially triggered starting in the 19th century.
The only exception to this history of stagnation was in the late 15th century, with the discovery of the American continent, but for this exception, throughout the whole period between the year zero and the year 1800, global per capita GDP stagnated.
Now, it's not just that capitalism brought about an explosion in wealth from the moment it was adopted as an economic system, but also, if you look at the data, what you will see is that growth continues to accelerate throughout the whole period.
And throughout the whole period between the year zero and the year 1800, the per capita GDP growth rate remains stable at around 0.02% annually. So almost no growth. Starting in the 19th century with the Industrial Revolution, the compound annual growth rate was 0.66%. And at that rate, in order to double per capita GDP, you would need some 107 years.
Now, if you look at the period between the year 1900 and the year 1950, the growth rate accelerated to 1.66% a year. So you no longer need 107 years to double per capita GDP - but 66. And if you take the period between 1950 and the year 2000, you will see that the growth rate was 2.1%, which would mean that in only 33 years we could double the world's per capita GDP.
This trend, far from stopping, remains well alive today. If we take the period between the years 2000 and 2023, the growth rate again accelerated to 3% a year, which means that we could double world per capita GDP in just 23 years.
That said, when you look at per capita GDP since the year 1800 until today, what you will see is that after the Industrial Revolution, global per capita GDP multiplied by over 15 times, which meant a boom in growth that lifted 90% of the global population out of poverty.
We should remember that by the year 1800, about 95% of the world's population lived in extreme poverty. And that figure dropped to 5% by the year 2020, prior to the pandemic. The conclusion is obvious.
Far from being the cause of our problems, free trade capitalism as an economic system is the only instrument we have to end hunger, poverty and extreme poverty across our planet. The empirical evidence is unquestionable.
Therefore since there is no doubt that free enterprise capitalism is superior in productive terms, the left-wing doxa has attacked capitalism, alleging matters of morality, saying - that's what the detractors claim - that it's unjust. They say that capitalism is evil because it's individualistic and that collectivism is good because it's altruistic. Of course, with the money of others.
So they therefore advocate for social justice. But this concept, which in the developed world became fashionable in recent times, in my country has been a constant in political discourse for over 80 years. The problem is that social justice is not just, and it doesn't contribute to general well-being.
Quite on the contrary, it's an intrinsically unfair idea because it's violent. It's unjust because the state is financed through tax and taxes are collected coercively. Or can any one of us say that we voluntarily pay taxes? This means that the state is financed through coercion and that the higher the tax burden, the higher the coercion and the lower the freedom.
Those who promote social justice start with the idea that the whole economy is a pie that can be shared differently. But that pie is not a given. It's wealth that is generated in what Israel Kirzner, for instance, calls a market discovery process.
If the goods or services offered by a business are not wanted, the business will fail unless it adapts to what the market is demanding. They will do well and produce more if they make a good quality product at an attractive price. So the market is a discovery process in which the capitalists will find the right path as they move forward.
But if the state punishes capitalists when they're successful and gets in the way of the discovery process, they will destroy their incentives, and the consequence is that they will produce less.
The pie will be smaller, and this will harm society as a whole. Collectivism, by inhibiting these discovery processes and hindering the appropriation of discoveries, ends up binding the hands of entrepreneurs and prevents them from offering better goods and services at a better price.
So how come academia, international organisations, economic theorists and politicians demonise an economic system that has not only lifted 90% of the world's population out of extreme poverty but has continued to do this faster and faster?
Thanks to free trade capitalism, the world is now living its best moment. Never in all of mankind or humanity's history has there been a time of more prosperity than today. This is true for all. The world of today has more freedom, is rich, more peaceful and prosperous. This is particularly true for countries that have more economic freedom and respect the property rights of individuals.
Countries that have more freedom are 12 times richer than those that are repressed. The lowest percentile in free countries is better off than 90% of the population in repressed countries. Poverty is 25 times lower and extreme poverty is 50 times lower. And citizens in free countries live 25% longer than citizens in repressed countries.
Now what is it that we mean when we talk about libertarianism? And let me quote the words of the greatest authority on freedom in Argentina, Professor Alberto Benegas Lynch Jr, who says that libertarianism is the unrestricted respect for the life project of others based on the principle of non-aggression, in defence of the right to life, liberty and property.
Its fundamental institutions are private property, markets free from state intervention, free competition, and the division of labour and social cooperation, in which success is achieved only by serving others with goods of better quality or at a better price.
In other words, capitalist successful business people are social benefactors who, far from appropriating the wealth of others, contribute to the general well-being. Ultimately, a successful entrepreneur is a hero.
And this is the model that we are advocating for the Argentina of the future. A model based on the fundamental principle of libertarianism. The defence of life, of freedom and of property.
Now, if the free enterprise, capitalism and economic freedom have proven to be extraordinary instruments to end poverty in the world, and we are now at the best time in the history of humanity, it is worth asking why I say that the West is in danger.
And I say this precisely because in countries that should defend the values of the free market, private property and the other institutions of libertarianism, sectors of the political and economic establishment are undermining the foundations of libertarianism, opening up the doors to socialism and potentially condemning us to poverty, misery and stagnation.
It should never be forgotten that socialism is always and everywhere an impoverishing phenomenon that has failed in all countries where it's been tried out. It's been a failure economically, socially, culturally and it also murdered over 100 million human beings.
The essential problem of the West today is not just that we need to come to grips with those who, even after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the overwhelming empirical evidence, continue to advocate for impoverishing socialism.
But there's also our own leaders, thinkers and academics who are relying on a misguided theoretical framework to undermine the fundamentals of the system that has given us the greatest expansion of wealth and prosperity in our history.
The theoretical framework to which I refer is that of Neoclassical economic theory, which designs a set of instruments that, unwillingly or without meaning to, end up serving intervention by the state, socialism and social degradation.
The problem with Neoclassicals is that the model they fell in love with does not map reality, so they put down their mistakes to supposed market failures rather than reviewing the premises of the model.
Under the pretext of a supposed market failure, regulations are introduced. These regulations create distortions in the price system, prevent economic calculus, and therefore also prevent saving, investment and growth.
This problem lies mainly in the fact that not even supposed libertarian economists understand what the market is because if they did understand, it would quickly be seen that it's impossible for there to be market failures.
The market is not a mere graph describing a curve of supply and demand. The market is a mechanism for social cooperation, where you voluntarily exchange ownership rights. Therefore based on this definition, talking about a market failure is an oxymoron. There are no market failures.
If transactions are voluntary, the only context in which there can be market failure is if there is coercion and the only one that is able to coerce generally is the state, which holds a monopoly on violence.
Consequently, if someone considers that there is a market failure, I would suggest that they check to see if there is state intervention involved. And if they find that that's not the case, I would suggest that they check again, because obviously there's a mistake. Market failures do not exist.
An example of the so-called market failures described by the Neoclassicals is the concentrated structure of the economy. From the year 1800 onwards, with the population multiplying by 8 or 9 times, per capita GDP grew by over 15 times, so there were growing returns which took extreme poverty from 95% to 5%.
However, the presence of growing returns involves concentrated structures, what we would call a monopoly. How come, then, something that has generated so much well-being for the Neoclassical theory is a market failure?
Neoclassical economists think outside of the box. When the model fails, you shouldn't get angry with reality but rather with a model and change it. The dilemma faced by the Neoclassical model is that they say they wish to perfect the function of the market by attacking what they consider to be failures. But in so doing, they don't just open up the doors to socialism but also go against economic growth.
For example, regulating monopolies, destroying their profits and destroying growing returns would automatically destroy economic growth.
However, faced with the theoretical demonstration that state intervention is harmful - and the empirical evidence that it has failed couldn't have been otherwise - the solution proposed by collectivists is not greater freedom but rather greater regulation, which creates a downward spiral of regulations until we are all poorer and our lives depend on a bureaucrat sitting in a luxury office.
Given the dismal failure of collectivist models and the undeniable advances in the free world, socialists were forced to change their agenda: they left behind the class struggle based on the economic system and replaced this with other supposed social conflicts, which are just as harmful to life and to economic growth.
The first of these new battles was the ridiculous and unnatural fight between man and woman. Libertarianism already provides for equality of the sexes. The cornerstone of our creed is that all humans are created equal and that we all have the same inalienable rights granted by the Creator, including life, freedom and ownership.
All that the radical feminism agenda has led to is greater state intervention to hinder economic process, giving jobs to bureaucrats who have not contributed anything to society. Examples are ministries of women or international organisations devoted to promoting this agenda.
Another conflict presented by socialists is that of humans against nature, claiming that we human beings damage a planet which should be protected at all costs, even going as far as advocating for population control mechanisms or the abortion agenda.
Unfortunately, these harmful ideas have taken a stronghold in our society. Neo-Marxists have managed to co-opt the common sense of the Western world, and this they have achieved by appropriating the media, culture, universities and also international organisations.
The latter case is the most serious one, probably because these are institutions that have enormous influence on the political and economic decisions of their member states.
Fortunately there's more and more of us who are daring to make our voices heard, because we see that if we don't truly and decisively fight against these ideas, the only possible fate is for us to have increasing levels of state regulation, socialism, poverty and less freedom, and therefore, worse standards of living.
The West has unfortunately already started to go along this path. I know, to many it may sound ridiculous to suggest that the West has turned to socialism, but it's only ridiculous if you only limit yourself to the traditional economic definition of socialism, which says that it's an economic system where the state owns the means of production. This definition in my view, should be updated in the light of current circumstances.
Today, states don't need to directly control the means of production to control every aspect of the lives of individuals. With tools such as printing money, debt, subsidies, controlling the interest rate, price controls, and regulations to correct so-called market failures, they can control the lives and fates of millions of individuals.
This is how we come to the point where, by using different names or guises, a good deal of the generally accepted ideologies in most Western countries are collectivist variants, whether they proclaim to be openly communist, fascist, socialist, social democrats, national socialists, Christian democrats, neo-Keynesians, progressives, populists, nationalists or globalists.
Ultimately, there are no major differences. They all say that the state should steer all aspects of the lives of individuals. They all defend a model contrary to the one that led humanity to the most spectacular progress in its history.
We have come here today to invite the Western world to get back on the path to prosperity. Economic freedom, limited government and unlimited respect for private property are essential elements for economic growth. The impoverishment produced by collectivism is not a fantasy, nor is it an inescapable fate. It's a reality that we Argentines know very well.
We have lived through this. We have been through this because, as I said earlier, ever since we decided to abandon the model of freedom that had made us rich, we have been caught up in a downward spiral - a spiral by which we are poorer and poorer, day by day.
This is something we have lived through and we are here to warn you about what can happen if countries in the Western world, that became rich through the model of freedom, stay on this path of servitude.
The case of Argentina is an empirical demonstration that no matter how rich you may be, how much you may have in terms of natural resources, how skilled your population may be, how educated, or how many bars of gold you may have in the central bank - if measures are adopted that hinder the free functioning of markets, competition, price systems, trade and ownership of private property, the only possible fate is poverty.
Therefore, in conclusion, I would like to leave a message for all business people here and those who are not here in person but are following from around the world.
Do not be intimidated by the political caste or by parasites who live off the state. Do not surrender to a political class that only wants to stay in power and retain its privileges. You are social benefactors. You are heroes. You are the creators of the most extraordinary period of prosperity we've ever seen.
Let no one tell you that your ambition is immoral. If you make money, it's because you offer a better product at a better price, thereby contributing to general wellbeing.
Do not surrender to the advance of the state. The state is not the solution. The state is the problem itself. You are the true protagonists of this story and rest assured that as from today, Argentina is your staunch and unconditional ally.
Thank you very much and long live freedom!